http://www.alternet.org…
By Michael Bader, AlterNet
Posted on October 28, 2008, Printed on October 28, 2008
The following is a response to Robert Jensen’s recent AlterNet article, “Porn’s Dirty, Dangerous Secret.”
When I was 13, a new friend, Andy, came over my house to watch television. We were watching the show, Time Tunnel. As the show neared its climax, I noticed that Andy was quite nervous. When I asked why, he said that it looked like the hero was about to be killed. I said, “Are you an idiot?! Of course he won’t be killed … this is a TV series and it’s on again next week!” It turned out that Andy’s family didn’t allow him to watch television and, therefore, he didn’t know that the hero of a television series never dies. He didn’t know the code.
Robert Jensen writes about pornography like someone who doesn’t know the code. He seems incapable of differentiating fantasy from reality. He keeps mistaking the reality of the sexual enactments depicted in gonzo porn with their meaning in fantasy to the men masturbating. If the woman on the screen is having 4 penises shoved into her, something that would demean and degrade any real woman reading Jensen’s article (and probably the actress performing such scenes), he automatically infers that the degradation must be the source of the male viewer’s arousal. It isn’t.
Read more…



